Recent content by Jason M.

  1. Jason M.

    Denied Give NHC/SC "11th Surveillance Brigade" and "Royal SpecOps Brigade" access to the Medic Drone

    What does this suggestion change/add/remove: Pretty self explanatory. HC currently get a drone that... Well, drones. Sure, it's good for spotting but, has no other features and no one uses them. Giving HC Special Ops jobs access to a medic drone would just be nice to have since it's a very...
  2. Jason M.

    Content Suggestion Proper Salaries

    +Support Gonna putin my two cents Just double the current wages, keep the event jobs, staff etc the same.. Ez fix
  3. Jason M.

    Accepted Add the Ghost R5 as a perma weapon to both Nato and NWO

    Neutral I usually don't like leaving neutral responses since they don't add anything but I think I speak for a majority when I say... I Don't really care.. Go for it? I feel like this suggestion is targeted directly at Ventz as he's the one that has a say in it so these comments probably don't...
  4. Jason M.

    Denied Let 17thAR/1stal have 4 HQs

    +Support I have no idea who told people that this would make HC less effective? We can unlock 17th HQs too... There is no reason I see for this to be denied. I see this as a potential great help for when HC are not available.
  5. Jason M.

    Partially Accepted Regimental Medals/Ribbons Addition

    Neutral I know for one that the current medal/ribbon system (atleast for NATO) is outdated as hell right now and I'm planning on doing a rework. I'm not sure if this suggestion would be impacted at all by +supports or -supports since, on base, it has no downsides and the only thing it would...
  6. Jason M.

    Accepted Disallow pathfinder FOB assaults if there's not at least 8 non afk people on both teams

    I don't even know what you're referring to. I'm gonna stop replyin to this thread because it's making my head hurty. -Support (for the last time). Unless you change the suggestion to accommodate 8 active players on both sides.
  7. Jason M.

    Denied Remove helicopter flares or increase turn rate of stinger

    -Support I hate playing against helis when I'm on ground as much as the next guy. But stingers work if you use them right. Take it from a shit pilot, and a 99% on ground player who also gets a negative KD most the day through having to lead wars and micromanage voice amp, helis aren't as hard...
  8. Jason M.

    Accepted Disallow pathfinder FOB assaults if there's not at least 8 non afk people on both teams

    If you are asking for literal bias for NWO, I am not gonna support your suggestion.. If you'd choose to edit this suggestion in order to make the rule that it can only be done when there are 8+ people on BOTH sides, I'd agree. Just because NATO are better are utilising something, does not mean...
  9. Jason M.

    Accepted Disallow pathfinder FOB assaults if there's not at least 8 non afk people on both teams

    -Support See, if the Playerbase had 8+ people on most times of the day I would be more than happy to +Support, but as of right now, this suggestion feels like its coming more from a place of NWO not having active people for pathfinder, while NATO does. Sure, pathfinder can be hard to play...
  10. Jason M.

    [UK] Huff's GM Demotion Appeal

    +Support Inactivity after over a year of dedicated playtime is more than understandable, and should be let off. Let the man back into GM
  11. Jason M.

    Partially Accepted Leopard, M1A1 and Arti changes

    +Support From a J.A.F P.O.V As a player from the early days of MRP, and the currently appointed J.A.F Regimental General, I will say that Artis have never caused a problem for CAS, at least, not if you have a competent pilot. Sure they're a threat if caught off guard, or by a good Arti player...
  12. Jason M.

    For hells sake, the 300th leaving of Renolk

    o7 Cya Lieutenant
  13. Jason M.

    Denied Pathfinder

    -support your suggestion is more broken than pathfinder
  14. Jason M.

    Denied Revert the rule change 2.06

    -Support It's a rule clarification. No rule was ever changed. It's specifically made for clarification that if you are called 'KOS if ___' it is classed as a threat which, is painfully obvious, though had to be clarified for.. Some reason. If this rule clarification was to be reverted and the...